BMW X3 M Car and Driver - Jeep TrackHawk Forum
 1Likes
  • 1 Post By Chicago X
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 7 Old 11-15-2019, 11:48 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Indiana
Posts: 157
BMW X3 M Car and Driver

Car and driver claims the new BMW X3 M with 473 hp can run 0-60 in 3.3 sec and the 1/4 in 11.6 at 119. How is this even possible? The X3 M weighs only 800 lbs less than the TH, yet is down 230 hp vs the TH.


Running the numbers.... a 4600 lb vehicle with 473 hp will run the 1/4 in 13 seconds and a 5400 lb vehicle with 700 hp will run it in 11.8 seconds, which is really close to the real world stock TH numbers.


Thoughts?

2002 Honda S2000 (fully built turbo beast)
2009 Acura MDX
2011 M3 ZCP
2018 Trackhawk (Rhino)
Spoolin is online now  
post #2 of 7 Old 11-15-2019, 12:26 PM
Member
 
Chicago X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 54
2 things:

1) BMW is notorious for underrating their engine output
2) Power-to-weight and gearing all play a factor.

I just came out of an X5M, and it ran 11.9 in decent air, a bit better than the claimed 12.3-12.4

Does C&D correct their times to sea level?
Chicago X is offline  
post #3 of 7 Old 11-15-2019, 01:44 PM
Super Moderator
 
Lil Hemi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,395
I remember there was lots of talk about all the car magazines use a certain method of measuring that makes the numbers slightly better. Thinking the term was rollout
Lil Hemi is online now  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #4 of 7 Old 11-15-2019, 02:27 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 402
BMW X3 M Car and Driver

Considering that people have put the M5 competition on dynos and have seen over 600 hp at the wheels, it wouldnt shock anyone if the x3m engine was close to 580+ hp at the crank.


Wife is checking out the X7s but we may have to wait until the new X5m appears in April/May before making that decision



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ThawkMike is online now  
post #5 of 7 Old 11-15-2019, 03:17 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Indiana
Posts: 157
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicago X View Post
2 things:

1) BMW is notorious for underrating their engine output
2) Power-to-weight and gearing all play a factor.

I just came out of an X5M, and it ran 11.9 in decent air, a bit better than the claimed 12.3-12.4

Does C&D correct their times to sea level?

Not sure how C&D came to their final numbers, but I was mistaken on the HP numbers for the X3 competition. It's actually 503 for the competition package. This would net that suv on paper at 12.8 in the 1/4. To get the X3 to a 11.6 quarter mile run, it would need to be making nearly 700 hp. Almost 200 hp more than claimed. No way BMW's numbers are that far off.


Hell, 503 whp in a 4600 lb vehicle won't even get you in the 11's on paper.


I know on paper isn't perfect, but it does get you close to the correct numbers and these aren't even close for the BMW X3 ZCP.

2002 Honda S2000 (fully built turbo beast)
2009 Acura MDX
2011 M3 ZCP
2018 Trackhawk (Rhino)

Last edited by Spoolin; 11-15-2019 at 03:27 PM.
Spoolin is online now  
post #6 of 7 Old 11-15-2019, 04:25 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 402
BMW X3 M Car and Driver

M5 and the X3 basically weigh the same, about 4400lbs

M5 comp are trapping 125ish, and High 10s/lowlow 11s and by dyno numbers , 700 crank.

At about 580-600 crank hp for the x3, those numbers seem inline.


We are about 800 Lbs more and run 11.6s with not much more then 700 crank.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Last edited by ThawkMike; 11-15-2019 at 05:46 PM.
ThawkMike is online now  
post #7 of 7 Old 11-15-2019, 06:32 PM
Member
 
Chicago X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 54
Im not sure what calculator was used to estimate The ETs, but my personal experience has a 700hp, 4450# car with 2.43 rear gears running 10.70s at over 130.

That was with a slow 5-speed auto shifting.

Add better gearing and a trick ZF 8-speed, and mid-to-high 11s seems doable with about 550hp and same weight.

I would wager a soda pop that these are underrated by about 10%
Tom C likes this.
Chicago X is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Jeep TrackHawk Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome